Vol 8. Myths Busted: The wrong way to evaluate inspection drones

Nesciunt

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Nesciunt aliquid reprehenderit ratione placeat quia, animi laboriosam cupiditate ipsam officia dolor voluptates? Voluptatum illum commodi est nemo maxime corrupti repellendus porro!

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Nesciunt aliquid reprehenderit ratione placeat quia, animi laboriosam cupiditate ipsam officia dolor voluptates? Voluptatum illum commodi est nemo maxime corrupti repellendus porro! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Nesciunt aliquid reprehenderit ratione placeat quia, animi laboriosam cupiditate ipsam officia dolor voluptates? Voluptatum illum commodi est nemo maxime corrupti repellendus porro!

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Nesciunt aliquid reprehenderit ratione placeat quia, animi laboriosam.

Placeat quia, animi labor:

placeat quia, animi laboriosam
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing

By submitting this form, you agree to the Skydio Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

The dominance of manual drones through the 2010s has shaped the way drone operators evaluate systems for purchase in unproductive ways. Many of the criteria by which operators evaluate drones today stem from an era when manual drones were the standard, and the leading aircraft were a combination of GPS-based airframe and a bolted-on camera system. When everyone was playing the same game, it was easy to put together simple judging criteria.

To learn more about the various drone options available for utility inspection, fill out your information on the right to download the latest volume of our ebook as a PDF, or click here to browse all the volumes.

By submitting this form, you agree to the Skydio Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.